The problem is always that free versions are almost never as effective as their paid compatriots, and relying on what are typically inferior versions to tell you that they failed sounds like a really bad idea. Nothing necessarily wrong with being paranoid, but that sounds like an exercise in futility. With that sort of approach, you may as well run nothing at all, because your response is the same both ways. It sounds like your system was neither effective, efficient, nor useful if your plan is to nuke and pave any time something wonky happens. So I guess if you want to spend money on one it's your call but it's not something I would ever consider.ĭoes paying for AV just make you feel more warm and fuzzy inside or something? Hell, even if I had a paid AV that detected something, I'd probably still wipe and reload a clone anyway just because I'm paranoid. Anything important is backed up so it's like not even a big deal if I got a virus on a home internet machine. I have not had a single issue and even if I did, I would simply wipe, reload a clone and continue business as usual. Then when MSSE came into the fray I generally partnered that up with one of the two aforementioned. I've always used Malwarebytes with Spybot S&D. I have no idea why you'd want to pay for antivirus when the free stuff works just as well if not better. I'm sure all of our competitors offer the same service, although I can't speak for all of them. If it helps, you can buy our products online with a credit card and just get billed automatically every year so you don't have to deal with the hassle of renewing manually or remembering to do it. While a one-time up front lifetime license sounds good, how do you put a price on something that has a daily/hourly/per-minute cost for the vendor? We already have a lot of people (many in this thread) who would prefer a free AV product over what is already an affordable product considering the value you get ($30 - $50/yr to protect you, your digital assets, your online banking, etc.), so asking them to pay exponentially more for a lifetime license just doesn't seem practical. The reality is, we have 1,000 threat researchers working every day to find new threats and update our detection technologies to protect our customers so we are delivering a service to you 24/7/365, and that doesn't even include the digital infrastructure we have to maintain (and pay for) to make sure those updates get to you in a timely manner. I've been working at Trend Micro for 13 years and we've never had a lifetime license and have always sold our products on a yearly basis. I appreciate the input from everyone but I guess subscription based pricing whether good or bad isn't going anywhere. I want a paid product I don't have to worry about paying for again every 1,2,3 years but I guess at this point I'll just opt to do a 3 year sub or perhaps just rock a free AV program again with malware bytes and call it a day. I don't have issues with the quality of the product but despite it being free you're still giving up something in return. I've used AVG and Comodo in the past but that's my issue, you get bombed with adware or messages from them prompting you to upgrade that don't go away and I don't feel like dealing with that. I've been happy with the free Sophos for Macs and AVG Free for Windows (although their prompts to "upgrade" are annoying). Most companies that charge don't offer the one-time purchase anymore, so if you don't want a subscription, you are basically forced to get a free version. You say you want a one-time purchase option, but that's the pricing model, not the product.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |